Disaster alert! Who knew you could go wrong with a batch of muffins? I've made so many muffins in the past, but the ones I've made from this book just don't turn out right at all. I decided to make these because I had a load of blueberries to clear up (daughter having issues with anything with some kind of skin). I thought she'd probably eat them if they were disguised as cake, and knew we'd enjoy them too. Anyway, I followed the recipe carefully (muffin recipes are dead easy), while making Sunday dinner, popped them in the oven when the roasts came out, and looked forward to sampling one for afters (as we say around here). Well. They looked nice enough, although not as risen as I was expecting. When we attempted to eat them, however, we discovered that they were just a soggy mess. You expect a bit of moisture from the blueberries, but this was ridiculous. I worried that I'd not baked them at the right temperature, but Joe pointed out that they seemed very 'eggy' and I could see what he meant. Elizabeth seemed to enjoy them, but I didn't want her to eat the middle bit, and although I picked at the tops of a few of them, I ended up binning the rest as the ink from the paper cases was bleeding into them, they were that soggy! I then conducted a bit of research, to try and work out why I was failing on the muffin front, and consulted Nigelle's 'Domestic Goddess' book, which I've used to make muffins before. Sure enough, her blueberry muffin recipe is almost exactly the same as Mary's, but with one key difference. She uses one egg instead of two. Could this be the cause of the egginess? It seems likely. So next time I make muffins, I'm going to just use the one egg and see what happens...
Baker's verdict: terrible, although they sort of tasted okay. Waste of good blueberries!
Husband rating: 4/10 - tasted of egg and seemed undercooked.
Baker's verdict: terrible, although they sort of tasted okay. Waste of good blueberries!
Husband rating: 4/10 - tasted of egg and seemed undercooked.
No comments:
Post a Comment